Time Travel Research Center © 2005 Cetin
BAL - GSM:+90 05366063183 - Turkey / Denizli
Dr. Hal Puthoff's
THE ENERGETIC VACUUM:
IMPLICATIONS FOR ENERGY RESEARCH
Reproduced below, with the permission of the author, is a paper written
Harold E. Puthoff, a respected physicist in quantum electrodynamics (QED)
and in the
relatively new field of stochastic electrodynamics (SED). This paper
originally appeared in Speculations in Science and Technology, vol. 13, no.
pp. 247-257, 1990. The reader is encouraged to obtain a copy of the
paper since the figures could not be reproduced here in ASCII.
This paper speculates, using current theories, that *net* energy MIGHT (and
only might) be extractable from the vacuum of space. Such a possibility
not necessarily violate current thermodynamic laws since all we need to do
to redraw our thermodynamic boundaries to include the vacuum energy of the
universe and its attributes. Dr. Puthoff is currently pursuing experimental
studies to ascertain whether or not there is tappable "excess" energy in the
vacuum (theoretical considerations cannot ascertain the answer to this
there are several possible reasons why it could exist). Since the
of this paper, some preliminary experimental results by Dr. Puthoff and his
associates using a "condensed charge technology device" indicate that the
vacuum indeed has significant "excess" energy that is tappable; further
to make sure of their results (to avoid the problems that plagued the cold
fusion controversy), and eventual publication will be done. A patent has
already been granted on this device: Patent Number 5,018,180, "Energy
Conversion Using High Charge Density..."
As an interesting aside, in my conversation with Dr. Puthoff recently, he
believed that anomalous heat generation observed in several "cold fusion"
experiments was not fusion, rather it was vacuum energy extraction (either
energy extraction from vacuum energy "excess", or vacuum energy charging and
later extraction similar to a battery). This could explain why any
heat generation was not accompanied by a neutron and radiation signature
indicating nuclear fusion. Thus, I'm cross-posting this to the fusion
newsgroup for their comment.
The reader is also referred to four other related papers by Dr. Puthoff
appeared in the literature (three appeared in Physical Review):
"Ground State of Hydrogen as a Zero-Point-Fluctuation-Determined State",
Physical Review D, vol. 35, no. 10, pp. 3266-3269, 15 May 1987.
"Gravity as a Zero-Point-Fluctuation Force", Physical Review A, vol. 39,
pp. 2333-2342, 1 March 1989.
"Source of Vacuum Electromagnetic Zero-Point Energy", Physical Review A,
40, no. 9, pp. 4857-4862, 1 November 1989. See also his replies to comments
Review A, vol. 44, no. 5, page 3382 and 3385-3386, and an Erratum in
Physical Review A,
vol. 41, no. 5, page 2902.
"Everything for Nothing", New Scientist, pp. 52-55, 28 July 1990.
-Beginning of Paper-
THE ENERGETIC VACUUM: IMPLICATIONS FOR ENERGY RESEARCH
Institute for Advanced Studies at Austin
1301 Capital of Texas Highway S., Suite A-232
Austin, TX 78746
"The existence of an actual vacuum was a subject of debate among
from Aristotle into the twentieth century. Since light, magnetic fields and
heat all travel through a vacuum, something must be there. Borrowing a word
from Aristotle, scientists described various kinds of 'aethers' that exist
even the hardest vacuum and that pervade space. Maxwell's theory of electro-
magnetism reduced these different types to just one, called the ether.
experiments were developed to detect this ether, of which the most famous
the Michelson-Morley experiment, which failed to find it. Finally, in 1905,
Einstein banished the ether by means of special relativity and allowed the
vacuum to exist.
"But not for long. The Heisenberg uncertainty principle of 1927 led
physicists to predict that particles would arise spontaneously from the
so long as they disappeared before violating the uncertainty principle. The
quantum vacuum is a very active place, with all sorts of particles appearing
and disappearing. Careful experiments have demonstrated that the quantum
theorists are correct in this interpretation of the vacuum... Furthermore,
starting in 1980 with the theory of the inflationary universe, particle
physicists have told us that the entire universe was created as a 'false
vacuum', a quantum vacuum that has more energy in its nothingness than it
should. The decay of that particular vacuum to an ordinary quantum vacuum
produced all the mass in the universe and started the Big Bang."
From "The Timetables of Science", Simon and Schuster, 1988
Modern physical theory, specifically quantum electrodynamics (QED), tells
that the vacuum can no longer be considered a void. This is due to the fact
that, even in the absence of matter, the vacuum is neither truly particle
field free, but is the seat of virtual particle-pair (e.g. electron-positron)
creation and annihilation processes, as well as zero-point-fluctuation (ZPF)
such fields as the vacuum electromagnetic field, which will be the focus of
Formally, the energy density associated with the vacuum electromagnetic
background is considered to be infinite. With appropriate high-frequency
cutoffs the ZPF energy density is still conservatively estimated to be on
order of nuclear energy densities or greater. The enormity of the
describing the vacuum electromagnetic zero-point energy raises the question
to whether these numbers should be taken seriously, whether they are due to
some defect or misinterpretation of the theory, whether the ZPF fields ought
be considered as 'virtual' or 'real'. There is, however, no question but
that the ZPF fields lead to real, measurable physical consequences. One
example is the very real Casimir force,[3-6] an experimentally-verified
ZPF-induced attractive quantum force between closely-spaced metal or
plates. An elegant analysis by Milonni, et al., at Los Alamos National
Laboratory shows that the Casimir force is due to radiation pressure from
background electromagnetic zero-point energy which has become unbalanced due
the presence of the plates, and which results in the plates being pushed
together. (We will discuss this effect in more detail later when we
address the possibility of ZPF energy extraction.) Other effects which can
traced back to interactions involving the ZPF fields in a fundamental way
include the Lamb shift (the slight perturbation of the emission lines seen
transitions between atomic states),[11-13] the van der Waals chemical
forces, the stabilization of atomic structure against radiative collapse,
[15-16] quantum field mechanisms underlying the gravitational interaction,
and spontaneous emission.
To understand just what the significance of zero-point energy is, let us
with a simple harmonic oscillator as shown in Figure 1. According to
theory, such a harmonic oscillator, once excited but with excitation removed,
will come to rest (because of friction losses) as shown in Figure 1(a). In
quantum theory, however, this is not the case. Instead, such an oscillator
will always retain a finite amount of 'jiggle', as shown in Figure 1(b).
average energy (kinetic plus potential) associated with this residuum of
motion, the so-called zero-point energy, is given by: <E>= hw/2, where 'h'
Planck's constant (h= 1.054e-34 joule/sec) and 'w' [really 'omega'] is the
frequency of oscillation. The meaning of the adjective 'zero-point' is that
such motion exists even at a temperature of absolute zero where no thermal
agitation effects remain. Similarly, if a cavity electromagnetic mode is
excited and then left to decay, as shown in Figure 2, the field energy dies
away, again to a minimum value <E>= hw/2 (half a photon's worth), indicating
that fields as well as mechanical systems are subject to zero-point
fluctuations. It is the presence of such ZPF 'noise' that can never be
rid of, no matter how perfect the technology, that sets a lower limit on the
detectability of electromagnetic signals.
If we now consider the universe as a whole as constituting a giant cavity,
we approach a continuum of possible modes (frequencies, directions) of
propagation of electromagnetic waves. Again, even in the absence of overt
excitation, quantum theory has us assign an <E>= hw/2 to each mode.
Multiplication of this energy by a density of modes factor  then yields
an expression for the spectral energy density that characterizes the vacuum
electromagnetic zero-point energy
rho(w)dw = [w^2/pi^2*c^3]/[hw/2]dw
= (hw^3)/(2*pi^2*c^3)dw joules/m^3 (eqn. 1)
There are a number of properties of the zero-point energy distribution
equation 1 that are worthy of note. First, the frequency behavior is seen
diverge as w^3. In the absence of a high-frequency cutoff this would imply
nfinite energy density. (This is the source of such statements regarding a
purely formal theory.) As discussed by Feynman and Hibbs, however, we have
evidence that QED remains valid at asymptotically high frequencies (vanishingly
small wavelengths). Therefore, we are justified in assuming a high-
frequency cutoff, and arguments based on the requirements of general
place this cutoff near the Planck frequency (~10^-33 cm). Even with
cutoff the mass-density equivalent of the vacuum ZPF fields is still on the
order of 10^94 g/cm^3. This caused Wheeler to remark that "elementary
particles represent a percentage-wise almost completely negligible change in
the locally violent conditions that characterize the vacuum...In other words,
elementary particles do not form a really basic starting point for the
description of nature. Instead, they represent a first-order correction to
vacuum physics." As high as this value is, one might think that the
energy would be easy to observe. Although this is true in a certain sense
is the source of quantum noise), by and large the homogeneity and isotropy
(uniformity) of the ZPF distribution prevent naive observation, and only
departures from uniformity yield overtly observable effects.
Contributing to the lack of direct observability is a second feature of
spectrum; namely, its Lorentz invariance. Whereas motion through all other
radiation fields, random or otherwise, can be detected by Doppler-shift
phenomena, the ZPF spectrum with its cubic frequency dependence is unique in
that detailed cancellation of Doppler shifts with velocity changes leaves
spectrum unchanged. (Indeed, one can derive the ZPF spectrum to within a
factor by simply postulating a Lorentz-invariant random radiation field.
[21,22]) Thus, although any particular component may Doppler shift as a
of motion, another component Doppler shifts to take its place. It is also
case, again unique to the ZPF cubic-frequency-dependent spectrum, that
shifts due to other phenomena (e.g., cosmological expansion, gravitation)
do not alter the spectrum.  This stands in contrast to, for example,
3 K blackbody (thermal) microwave background left over from the Big Bang
cools with cosmological expansion.
Yet another feature of the ZPF spectrum, related to its Lorentz
again unique in comparison with all other competitors, is the complete lack
a drag force on a charged particle passing through it. This is because such
drag forced (the so-called Einstein-Hopf drag ) is proportional to the
factor [rho(w) - (w/3)*(d rho/dw)], and this vanishes identically for
rho(w) ~= w^3.
On the other hand, accelerated motion through the vacuum can in principle
reveal the presence of the ZPF energy density directly. Unlike uniform
in which delicate cancellations of Doppler shifts leave the motion
in accelerated motion the Doppler-shift cancellations are no longer
As a result, the Lorentz-invariant spectrum which holds in uniform motion is
augmented by additional terms. One factor yields a thermal (Planck)
of temperature T= h*a/2*pi*c*k, where 'a' is acceleration, 'k' is
constant and 'T' is temperature. This is known as the Davies-Unruh effect.
[25,26] Yet another factor which shows up in the ZPF spectrum of an
accelerated observer is found, via the equivalence principle, to reveal a
connection between zero-point energy and gravity along lines originally
proposed by Sakharov  (that gravity could be understood as an induced
effect brought about by changes in the quantum fluctuation energy of the
due to the presence of matter ).
Thus we see that, with its roots in relativity theory which banished the
QED has in some sense come full circle to provide us with a model of an
energetic vacuum that once again constitutes a plenum rather than a void.
SOURCE OF ZERO-POINT ENERGY
The fact that the vacuum constitutes an energy reservoir leads naturally
question as to where the zero-point energy comes from, specifically, the
electromagnetic zero-point energy under discussion here. (This is an
especially important issue if one considers the possibility of extracting
energy for use.) Nature provides us with but two alternatives: existence
fiat as part of the boundary conditions of the present universe (like, for
example, the 3 K cosmic background radiation left over from the Big Bang),
generation by the (quantum fluctuation) motion of charged particles that
constitute matter. This latter possibility was explored in a recent paper
the author, with positive results.
The argument goes as follows. Given charged particles in quantum zero-point
motion throughout the universe, a 1/r^2 dependence of the radiation from
motion, and an average volume distribution of such particles in spherical
shells about any given point that is proportional to the area of the shell
(that is,proportional to r^2), one could reasonably expect to find at any
point a sum of contributions from the surrounding shells that yielded a high-
density radiation field. (Recall a similar argument in astronomy associated
with Olbers' paradox.) The high-density ZPF fields would appear to be just
such a field.
The details of the calculations examine the possibility that ZPF fields
particle motion, and that the sum of particle motions throughout the
in turn generates the ZPF fields, in the form of a self-regenerating
cosmological feedback cycle not unlike a cat chasing its own tail. This
consistent field approach, carried out assuming inflationary cosmology, is
found to yield the correct frequency distribution and the correct order of
magnitude to match the known ZPF distribution, thus supporting the
that the ZPF fields are dynamically generated.
As it turns out, there is an additional bonus from the calculations. A
expression relating the zero-point energy density to such factors as the
density and size of the universe also yields a precise expression for an
observed 'cosmological coincidence' often discussed in the context of
large-numbers hypothesis: namely, that the electromagnetic-to-gravitational
force ratio between an electron and proton is equal to the ratio of the
distance to the size of the classical electron. According to the relevant
calculations such a cosmological coincidence is seen to be a consequence of
cosmologically-based ZPF-generation mechanism under consideration that
to link cosmological and atomic parameters.
The overall picture that emerges, then, is that the electromagnetic ZPF
spectrum is generated by the motion of charged particles throughout the
universe which are themselves undergoing ZPF-induced motion, in a kind of
regenerating grand ground state of the universe. In contrast to other
particle-field interactions, the ZPF interaction constitutes an underlying,
stable 'bottom-rung' vacuum state that decays no further but reproduces
on a dynamic-generation basis. In such terms it is possible to explicate on
rational basis the observed presence of vacuum zero-point energy.
VACUUM ENERGY EXTRACTION?
As we have seen, the vacuum constitutes an extremely energetic physical
Nonetheless, it is a giant step to consider the possibility that vacuum
can be 'mined' for practical use. To begin, without careful thought as to
role that the vacuum plays in particle-vacuum interactions, it would only be
natural to assume that any attempt to extract energy from the vacuum might
somehow violate energy conservation laws or thermodynamic constraints (as in
misguided attempts to extract energy from a heat bath under equilibrium
conditions). As we shall see, however, this is not quite the case.
The premier example for considering the possibility of extracting energy
the vacuum has already appeared in the literature in a paper by R.L. Forward
entitled "Extraction of Electrical Energy From the Vacuum..."; it is
Casimir effect. Let us examine carefully this ZPF-driven phenomenon.
With parallel, non-charged conducting plates set a distance D apart, only
(electromagnetic) modes which satisfy the plate boundary conditions (vanishing
tangential electric field) are permitted to exist. In the interior space
constrains the modes to a discrete set of wavelengths for which an integer
number of half-wavelengths just spans the distance D (see Figure 3). In
particular, no mode for which a half-wavelength is greater than D can fit;
a result, all longer-wavelength modes are excluded, since for these
the pair of plates constitutes a cavity below cutoff. The constraints for
modes exterior to the plates, on the other hand, are much less restrictive
to the larger spaces involved. Therefore, the number of viable modes
is greater than that interior. Since such modes, even in vacuum state,
energy and momentum, the radiation pressure inward overbalances that outward,
and detailed calculation shows that the plates are pushed together with a
that varies as 1/D^4, viz,
F/A = -(pi^2/240)(h*c/D^4) newtons/m^2 (eqn. 2)
The associated attractive potential energy (Casimir energy) varies as
U/A = -(pi^2/720)/(h*c/D^3) joules/m^2 (eqn. 3)
As is always the case, bodies in an attractive potential, free to move,
so, and in this case the plates will move toward each other. The
of energy dictates that in this process potential energy is converted to
other form, in this case the kinetic energy of motion. When the plates
collide, the kinetic energy is then transformed into heat. (The overall
process is essentially identical to the conversion of gravitational
energy into heat by an object that falls to the ground.) Since in this case
the Casimir energy derives from the vacuum, the process constitutes the
conversion of vacuum energy into heat, and is no more mysterious than in the
analogous gravitational case.
In such fashion we see that the conversion of vacuum energy into heat,
than violating the conservation of energy, is in fact required by it. And
conversion can be traced microjoule by microjoule as modes (and their
corresponding zero-point energies) are eliminated by the shrinking
of the plates. What takes getting used to conceptually is that the vacuum
state does not have a fixed energy value, but changes with boundary
In this case vacuum-plus-plates-far-apart is a higher energy state than
plus-plates-close-together, and the combined system will decay from the
energy state to the lower, in the process creating kinetic energy, then heat,
to conserve overall energy. Similar vacuum-decay processes have been
within the context of so-called charged vacuum states.
With regard to extracting zero-point energy for use, in Forward's
embodiment the two plates in a Casimir experiment are charged with the same-
sign charge (e.g., electrons). At sufficiently small spacings the Coulomb
repulsion between the plates (which goes in an inverse square law 1/D^2 or
less, depending on spacing and geometry) can always be overcome by the
1/D^4 attractive Casimir force. The plates will therefore be drawn together
a collapsing motion. This confines the charge distribution to a smaller and
smaller volume and results in an increased electric field strength in the
vicinity of the plates. In such fashion the zero-point energy (Casimir
is transformed into stored Coulomb energy, which can then be extracted by a
variety of means.
Although demonstrating in principle the extraction of energy from the
Forward's embodiment is admittedly impractical for significant, continuous
energy generation, for a number of reasons. First and foremost is the fact
that the generator is a 'one-shot' device. To recycle the generator one
put as much energy into the device to return the plates to their original
separated positions as was obtained during the collapse phase, as would be
expected in any conservative potential. As a result, given the losses in
real system, not even 'break-even' operation can be achieved, let alone net
Let us carry this one step further, however. If one could arrange to
inexhaustible supply of such devices, and if it took less energy to make
device than was obtained from the Casimir-collapse process, and if the
were discarded after use rather than recycled, then one could envision the
conversion of vacuum energy to use with a net positive yield. Although
certainly not achievable in terms of mechanical devices, a possible
for exploitation along such lines would be the generation of a cold, dense,
non-neutral (charged) plasma in which charge condensation takes place not on
the basis of charged plates being drawn together, but on the basis of a
pinch effect. (Casimir pinch effects have been explored in the literature,
with regard to energy conversion, but in terms of semiclassical modelling of
charge confinement in elementary particles, hadron bag models, etc.)
an approach would constitute a 'Casimir-fusion' process, which in its cycle
operation would mimic the nuclear-fusion process. It would begin, like its
nuclear counterpart, with an initial energy input into a plasma to overcome
Coulomb barrier, followed by a condensation of charged particles drawn
by a strong, short-range attractive potential (in this case a Casimir rather
than a nuclear potential), and with an accompanying energy release. Should
energy requirements for plasma formation, and electrical circuit and heat
losses be kept at a level below that required for break-even operation, then
net, useful energy could in principle be generated, as in the nuclear case.
Such a proposal is, of course, highly speculative at this point, and further
detailed analysis of the energetics involved may yet uncover some hidden
in the concept. Nonetheless, known to this author are programs in the
States, the Soviet Union and other countries to explore just such an
on an experimental basis.
The above provides just one example of the type of concept that can be
with regard to possible vacuum energy extraction. Other proposals for
extracting vacuum energy have been made as well, covering the gamut from
the clearly unworkable to the intriguing. To this author's way of thinking,
however, there is as yet neither clear-cut evidence of experimental success
an absolutely unimpeachable theoretical construct. Nonetheless, it is only
continued, careful consideration of such proposals that we can hope to
the issue as to whether energy can be extracted from the vacuum, as part of
generalized 'vacuum engineering' concept of the type suggested by Nobel
Laureate T.D. Lee. As a caution along the way, the prudent scientist,
while generally keeping an open mind as to the possibility of vacuum energy
extraction, must of course approach any particular device claim or
proposal with the utmost rigor with regard to verification and validation.
Can the energy crisis be solved by harnessing the energies of the zero-point
sea? In the final analysis, given our relative ignorance at this point we
of necessity fall back on a quote given by Podolny  when contemplating
same issue. "It would be just as presumptuous to deny the feasibility of
useful application as it would be irresponsible to guarantee such
Only the future can reveal whether a program to extract energy from the
will meet with success.
I wish to express my appreciation to G.W. Church, Jr., for helpful
in the exploration of the concepts developed here. I also wish to thank
Shoulders of Jupiter Technologies, Austin, Texas, and William L. Stoner, III,
of OmniTech International, Springdale, Virginia, for continuing impetus and
encouragement to explore these issues.
1. Feynman, R.P. and Hibbs, A.R. *Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals*,
page 245, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1965. See also Misner, C.W., Thorne,
K.S. and Wheeler, J.A. *Gravitation*, page 1202 ff. Freeman, San
2. See, for example, the Closing Remarks section in Boyer, T.H., Phys.
Rev. D, volume 29, p. 1089, 1984. It can be added that, although the
approach developed here involves treating the ZPF fields as real, an
alternative viewpoint can be taken in which the results of field-
particle interactions traditionally attributed to ZPF are expressed
instead in terms of the radiation reaction of the particles involved,
without explicit reference to the ZPF. For this viewpoint, see
P.W., Phys. Rev. A, volume 25, p. 1315, 1982. Although it is
assumed that the radiation-reaction approach might imply that the ZPF
fields do not exist, detailed analysis (see Milonni's paper) shows
even though the interpretation of ZPF effects "can be given
in terms of either radiation reaction or the zero-point field, *both
fields are in fact necessary for the formal consistency of the theory*."
The interrelationship between these two approaches (ZPF, radiation
reaction) can be shown to be complementary on the basis of an
3. Casimir, H.B.G., Proc. K. Ned. Akad. Wet., volume 51, p. 793, 1948.
4. Fierz, M. Helv. Phys. Acta., volume 33, p. 855, 1960.
5. Marshall, T.W. Nuovo Cimento, volume 38, p. 206, 1965.
6. Boyer, T.H. Ann. Phys., volume 56, p. 474, 1970.
7. Wittmann, F., Splittgerber, H. and Ebert, K. Z. Phys, volume 245,
p. 354, 1971.
8. Israelachvili, J.N. and Tabor, D. Proc. Roy Soc. London, Ser. A,
331, p. 19, 1972.
9. Arnold, W., Hunklinger, S. and Dransfeld, K. Phys Rev. B, volume
p. 6049, 1979; Phys. Rev. E, volume 21, p. 1713, 1980.
10. Milonni, P.W., Cook, R.J. and Goggin, M.E. Phys. Rev. A, volume 38,
p. 1621, 1988.
11. Lamb, W.E., Jr. and Retherford, R.C. Phys. Rev., volume 72, p. 241,
12. Bethe, H.A. Phys. Rev., volume 72, p. 339, 1947.
13. Welton, T.A. Phys. Rev., volume 74, p. 1157, 1948.
14. Boyer, T.H. Phys. Rev., volume 180, p. 19, 1969; Phys. Rev. A,
p. 1832, 1973.
15. Puthoff, H.E. Phys. Rev. D, volume 35, p. 3266, 1987. See also
New Scientist, volume 115, p. 26, 9 July 1987.
16. Cetto, A.M. and Pena, L. de la. Found. Phys., volume 19, p. 419,
17. See Puthoff, H.E. Phys. Rev. A, volume 39, p. 2333, 1989 and
18. Milonni, P.W. Physica Scripta, volume T 21, p. 102, 1988.
19. See, for example, Pantell, R.H. and Puthoff, H.E. *Fundamentals of
Quantum Electronics*, pp. 179 ff., Wiley, New York, 1969.
20. Wheeler, J.A. *Geometrodynamics*, Academic Press, New York, 1962.
21. Marshall, T.W. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc., vol. 61, p. 537, 1965.
22. Boyer, T.H. Phys. Rev., vol. 182, p. 1374, 1969.
23. Puthoff, H.E. Phys. Rev. A, volume 40, p. 4857, 1989. Errata in
Phys. Rev. A, volume 44, p. 3385, 1991. See also New Scientist,
volume 124, p. 36, 2 December 1989.
24. Milonni, P.W. Am. J. Phys., volume 49, p. 177, 1981.
25. Davies, P.C.W. J. Phys. A, volume 8, p. 609, 1975.
26. Unruh, W.G. Phys. Rev. D, volume 14, p. 870, 1976. For a semi-classical
derivation, see also Boyer, T.H. Phys. Rev. D, volume 21, p. 2137,
27. Sakharov, A.D. Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR [Sov. Phys. - Dokl., volume
p. 1040], 1968. See also Misner, C.W., Thorne, K.S. and Wheeler,
Gravitation, pp. 426-428, Freeman, San Francisco, 1973.
28. Forward, R.L. Phys. Rev. B, volume 30, p. 1700, 1984.
29. Rafelski, J., Fulcher, L.P. and Klein, A. Phys. Rep., volume 38, p.
1978. See also "The Decay of the Vacuum", Scientific American,
241, p. 150, 1979.
30. For the original concept see Casimir, H.B.G., Physica, volume 19, p.
1956. Early follow-on efforts include Boyer, T.H., Phys. Rev, volume
p. 1764, 1968; Milton, K.A., Annals Phys., volume 127, p. 49, 1980;
DeRaad, L.L., Jr. and Milton, K.A., Annals Phys., vol. 136, p. 229,
Brevik, I., Annals Phys., volume 138, p. 36, 1982; Brevik, I. and
Kolbenstevdt, H., Annals Phys., volume 143, p. 179, 1982.
31. Booth, L.I. Speculat. Sci. Tech., volume 10, p. 201, 1987.
32. Lee, T.D. *Particle Physics and Introduction to Field Theory*, p.
Harwood Academic Publ., London, 1988.
33. Podolny, R. *Something Called Nothing*, Mir Publ., Moscow 1986.
yazı/ resim izinsiz olarak kullanılamaz!! Telif hakları uyarınca
bu bir suçtur..! Tüm hakları Çetin BAL' a aittir. Kaynak gösterilmek şartıyla siteden
The Time Machine Project © 2005 Cetin BAL - GSM:+90 05366063183 -Turkiye/Denizli
Ana Sayfa /index /Roket bilimi /
E-Mail /CetinBAL/Quantum Teleportation-2
Time Travel Technology /Ziyaretçi
Defteri /UFO Technology/Duyuru
Kuantum Teleportation /Kuantum Fizigi
New World Order(Macro Philosophy)